<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dirty politics hurts real people: Massa v Dickert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innoparticularorder.com/2006/11/dirty-politics-hurts-real-people-massa-v-dickert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innoparticularorder.com/2006/11/dirty-politics-hurts-real-people-massa-v-dickert/</link>
	<description>eCommerce, business, publishing, stuff... Ian Jindal's weblog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bleak House Redux: Sanford gets his apology from Massa</title>
		<link>http://www.innoparticularorder.com/2006/11/dirty-politics-hurts-real-people-massa-v-dickert/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleak House Redux: Sanford gets his apology from Massa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencil.net/bl0g/?p=216#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] I initially commented on this case - which is pretty off-topic for me - because I know Sanford and respect his energy, enthusiasm and 110%+ commitment to all the causes into which he throws himself. I&#8217;m no softy when it comes to political machinations and manipulations, but I was stunned and disappointed that someone who was standing for a position of trust and authority would use defamation, slur and the conduct of his son in to wheedle out of his agreement. The whole thing reminded me of Jonathan Aitken&#8217;s brazen challenging of the media with his sword of barefacedness and the trusty shield of a false familial alibi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I initially commented on this case &#8211; which is pretty off-topic for me &#8211; because I know Sanford and respect his energy, enthusiasm and 110%+ commitment to all the causes into which he throws himself. I&#8217;m no softy when it comes to political machinations and manipulations, but I was stunned and disappointed that someone who was standing for a position of trust and authority would use defamation, slur and the conduct of his son in to wheedle out of his agreement. The whole thing reminded me of Jonathan Aitken&#8217;s brazen challenging of the media with his sword of barefacedness and the trusty shield of a false familial alibi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.innoparticularorder.com/2006/11/dirty-politics-hurts-real-people-massa-v-dickert/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencil.net/bl0g/?p=216#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I read those things - why did Massa sling so much mud rather than just paying the man his wages? By this point, since Dickert didn&#039;t run from the bully, lawyers probably cost him more! Now I&#039;ve heard he blames Dikcert for his loss - what a load.  I hate to see a Repub. win, but Massa&#039;s loss was an indictment of his character, not a reflection of legal cases.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read those things &#8211; why did Massa sling so much mud rather than just paying the man his wages? By this point, since Dickert didn&#8217;t run from the bully, lawyers probably cost him more! Now I&#8217;ve heard he blames Dikcert for his loss &#8211; what a load.  I hate to see a Repub. win, but Massa&#8217;s loss was an indictment of his character, not a reflection of legal cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
